1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 294 N.J.
  5. 294 N.J. Super. 46 (1996)
 

ECKERT v. RUMSEY PARK ASSOCIATES

294 N.J. Super. 46 (1996)

682 A.2d 720

CYNTHIA ECKERT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. RUMSEY PARK ASSOCIATES, AND AFFILIATED MANAGEMENT, INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided September 25, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert E. Levy argued the cause for appellant (Scarinci & Hollenbeck, attorneys; Mr. Levy, of counsel and on the brief; Alicia M. Morejon, on the brief).

Robert A. Morley argued the cause for respondent (Mauro C. Casci, attorney; Eli L. Eytan, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges SHEBELL, BAIME and BRAITHWAITE.

The opinion of the court was delivered by SHEBELL, P.J.A.D.

In this appeal, from what plaintiff contends is an inadequate jury verdict, the critical issue is whether the trial judge committed reversible error by not allowing the jury to have, either on plaintiff's direct case or in rebuttal to defense psychiatric testimony, the de bene esse deposition of a licensed psychologist who treated plaintiff. Plaintiff claims that, contrary to the trial court's ruling...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases