LINDENMUTH v. HOLDEN


296 N.J. Super. 42 (1996)

IRENE LINDENMUTH AND WILLIAM LINDENMUTH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. ROBERT HOLDEN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 17, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert J. Kelly, Jr., argued the cause for appellants.

Robert G. Harbeson argued the cause for respondent (Archer & Greiner, attorneys; John C. Connell, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges MICHELS, KLEINER and COBURN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by MICHELS, P.J.A.D.

Plaintiff Irene Lindenmuth and her husband, plaintiff William Lindenmuth, appeal from an order of the Law Division that denied their motion for a new trial in this personal injury automobile action which resulted in a judgment in favor of defendant Robert Holden.

Plaintiff suffered personal injuries when an automobile in which she allegedly was riding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases