1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 234 A.D.2d
  5. 234 A.D.2d 95 (1996)
 

BRUCKERT-HOLLAND v. RAND

234 A.D.2d 95 (1996)

650 N.Y.S.2d 233

Frank Bruckert-Holland, Respondent, v. Donald Rand, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

December 10, 1996

The motion was properly denied, defendant having failed to comply with the requirements of CPLR 511 (b) necessary to preserve his right to a change of venue under CPLR 510 (1). Further, defendant offered no other reason for changing venue except his own inconvenience, which showing was patently insufficient (see, Rosenthal v Bologna, 211 A.D.2d 436, 437; Cardona v Aggressive Heating, 180 A.D.2d 572...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases