Michele CATANZANO, by her parent and next friend, Sam CATANZANO, Francine Catanzano, and Sarah Trafton, on behalf of herself and all persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
Jannie Wilson, Mary Jane Smith, and Charles Smith, Intervenors-Plaintiffs-Appellees,
Andrew Doniger, M.D., as Director of the Monroe County Department of Health, and Richard F. Schauseil, as Acting Director of the Monroe County Department of Social Services, Defendants-Third-Party-Plaintiffs,
v.
Brian WING, as Acting Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, Defendant-Appellant,
Visiting Nurse Service of New York Home Care, Metropolitan Jewish Geriatric Center, and Home Care Association of New York State, Inc., Movants-Appellants,
Mary Jo Bane, Defendant-Third-Party-Defendant,
Mark Chassin, as Commissioner of the State of New York Department of Health, Third-Party-Defendant,
W. Burton Richardson and Joel Nitzken, Defendants.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued September 13, 1996.
Decided December 23, 1996.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Peter G. Crary, Assistant Attorney General of the State of New York, Albany, NY (Dennis C. Vacco, Attorney General of the State of New York, Peter H. Schiff, Deputy Solicitor General, Patrick Barnett-Mulligan, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Defendant-Appellant.
Peter G. Bergman, Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, New York City (Eileen M. Considine, Hinman, Straub, Pigors & Manning, P.C., Albany, NY, of counsel), for Movants-Appellants VNS and MJGC.
Thomas F. Gleason, Gleason, Dunn, Walsh & O'Shea, Albany, NY, for Movant-Appellant HCA.
Ellen Yacknin, Greater Upstate Law Project, Inc., Rochester, NY (Bryan D. Hetherington, Susan Ann Silverstein, Public Interest Law Office of Rochester, Rochester, NY, of counsel), for Plaintiffs-Appellees and Intervenors-Plaintiffs-Appellees.
Before: OAKES and CALABRESI, Circuit Judges, and CONNER, District Judge.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
CALABRESI, Circuit Judge:
Complex regulatory schemes produce complex cases. And the interplay between complex state and federal statutory and regulatory schemes produces very complicated cases. This is just such a case. In it, we consider the scope of our prior decision, Catanzano v. Dowling,60 F.3d 113 (2d Cir.1995), and the extent to which it already decided various issues of federal and state statutory and regulatory law...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
