1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 145 N.J.
  5. 145 N.J. 180 (1996)
 

PREVRATIL v. MOHR

145 N.J. 180 (1996)

678 A.2d 243

JOSEPH PREVRATIL AND LISA PREVRATIL, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. GEORGE MOHR AND RICH HILL, TRANSPORTATION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided July 10, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth S. Javerbaum argued the cause for appellants (Javerbaum Wurgaft & Hicks, attorneys; Mr. Javerbaum and Eric G. Kahn, on the brief).

Modestino Carbone argued the cause for respondents (McDonald, Nathan & Carbone, attorneys).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by POLLOCK, J.

The primary issue is whether we should create an exception from the entire controversy doctrine for automobile-negligence cases. Specifically, the question is whether the entire controversy doctrine bars the personal injury action of plaintiffs, Joseph Prevratil, and his wife, Lisa, when counsel for his employer's insurer defended Prevratil and the employer in a prior...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases