Per Curiam.
We are asked to determine whether the commission abused its discretion in denying both claimant's VSSR and rehearing applications. For the reasons to follow, we find that it did not.
Of the several violations initially alleged, claimant now pursues only one—Ohio Adm.Code 4121:1-5-08(D)(1)(b). That section reads:
"The hood type guard shall be so designed as to prevent a kickback or a separate attachment that will prevent a...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
