RAVICH, KOSTER, TOBIN, OLECKNA, REITMAN & GREENSTEIN, P.C. v. GOURVITZ


147 N.J. 170 (1996)

685 A.2d 1308

RAVICH, KOSTER, TOBIN, OLECKNA, REITMAN & GREENSTEIN, P.C., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ELLIOT H. GOURVITZ, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided December 16, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elliot H. Gourvitz argued the cause pro se.

Michael N. Tobin argued the cause for respondent (Ravich, Koster, Tobin, Oleckna, Reitman & Greenstein, attorneys; Bruce W. Radowitz, on the brief).


PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment in favor of respondent substantially for the reasons set forth in the Appellate Division opinion. 287 N.J.Super. 533, 671 A.2d 613 (1996). That court's holding has limited application because, as it noted, id. at 538, 671 A.2d 613, the recent amendment to Rule 1:39-6(d) expressly prohibits the payment of referral...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases