1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 102 F.3d
  5. 102 F.3d 204 (1996)
 

U.S. v. BRADSHAW

No. 94-6487.

102 F.3d 204 (1996)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony E. BRADSHAW, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided December 6, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stuart J. Canale, Asst. U.S. Attorney (argued and briefed), Office of the U.S. Attorney, Memphis, TN, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Anthony E. Bradshaw, Leavenworth, KS, pro se.

Gerald L. Gulley, Jr. (argued and briefed), Baker, McReynolds, Byrne, Brackett, O'Kane & Shea, Knoxville, TN, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: MILBURN and SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judges; ROSEN, District Judge.

ROSEN, District Judge.

In this case we decide whether Appellant's motion to suppress evidence that was obtained after he was stopped for driving with an altered temporary vehicle license tag should have been granted. The District Court denied the motion, and we now AFFIRM.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

During a routine traffic patrol on October 19, 1991, Memphis police officer Martin Kula ("Officer Kula") came up behind Defendant-Appellant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases