1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 147 N.J.
  5. 147 N.J. 156 (1996)
 

REINHART v. E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS

147 N.J. 156 (1996)

685 A.2d 1301

TOBY EASTON REINHART, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided December 16, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sheldon Schiffman argued the cause for appellant (Michals, Wahl, Silver & Leitner, attorneys).

Fred Hopke argued the cause for respondent (Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, attorneys).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by COLEMAN, J.

The narrow issue raised in this workers' compensation case is whether an improper use of a transcript of a prior workers' compensation proceeding was so prejudicial that a redetermination of the merits of the claims should be required. The Appellate Division concluded that a reversal and remand are required. We granted certification, 144 N.J. 585, 677 A.2d 758

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases