MIDDLETON v. CUYAHOGA CTY. BD. OF REVISION

Nos. 94-2399, 94-2534, 95-300 and 95-463.

74 Ohio St.3d 228 (1996)

MIDDLETON, APPELLANT, v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided January 10, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David J. Middleton, pro se.

Stephanie Tubbs Jones, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Marilyn Barkley Cassidy, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellees Cuyahoga County Board of Revision and Cuyahoga County Auditor.

Armstrong, Mitchell & Damiani, Timothy J. Armstrong and Victor V. Anselmo, for appellee Cleveland Board of Education in case Nos. 94-2399 and 95-300.

Kelly, McCann & Livingstone and Robert A. Brindza, for appellee Cuyahoga Heights Board of Education in case No. 94-2534.

Kadish & Bender, Kevin M. Hinkel and David G. Lambert, for appellee Board of Education for the Berea City School District in case No. 95-463.

Rosenzweig, Schulz & Gillombardo Co., L.P.A., and Bill J. Gagliano, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, Westlake Board of Education in case No. 94-2399.


Case Nos. 94-2399, 94-2534, 95-300 and 95-463 are consolidated. The decisions of the Board of Tax Appeals are affirmed on the authority of Middleton v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 226, 658 N.E.2d 267, decided today.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases