1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 295 N.J.
  5. 295 N.J. Super. 1 (1996)
 

KLESH v. CODDINGTON

295 N.J. Super. 1 (1996)

684 A.2d 504

THOMAS KLESH AND PATRICIA KLESH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. VIRGINIA CODDINGTON, ROBERT I. BOBROW, WILLIAM W. LANIGAN, AND TOWNSHIP OF BRIDGEWATER, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. ARMANDO MONTE CONSALVO A/K/A MONTE CONSALVO, AND HENRY CONSALVO, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. VIRGINIA CODDINGTON, ROBERT I. BOBROW, WILLIAM W. LANIGAN, AND TOWNSHIP OF BRIDGEWATER, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 23, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael S. Karpoff argued the cause for appellants (Perl, Karpoff & Kessler, attorneys; Mr. Karpoff, on the brief).

Richard H. Thiele argued the cause for respondent Virginia Coddington (Mr. Thiele, on the letter brief).

Joanna L. Crosby argued the cause for respondent Robert I. Bobrow (O'Donnell, Kennedy, Vespole, Piechta & Trifiolis, attorneys; Ms. Crosby, of counsel and on the brief).

George Karousatos argued the cause for respondent William W. Lanigan (Ronan, Tuzzio, Giannone & McGuire, attorneys; Jennifer Fisher Weiss, on the letter brief).

Michael F. O'Gara argued the cause for respondent Township of Bridgewater (Siegel & Siegel, attorneys; Mr. O'Gara, on the letter brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER, HUMPHREYS and WECKER.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs in these consolidated actions appeal, on leave granted, from the entry of summary judgment dismissing their malicious prosecution and malicious use of process actions against defendants. We affirm substantially for the reasons stated by Judge Hoens in her opinion reported at 295 N.J.Super. 51, 684 A.2d 530 (Law Div. 1996...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases