The motion was properly denied, there being issues of fact as to whether defendants signed the note under economic duress created by plaintiff's allegedly false promises that it would diligently attempt to satisfy its contractual commitments necessary to move the parties' real estate transaction to closing, its alleged mismanagement of the properties that defendants handed over to it in reliance on such false promises, and its wrongful refusal to return management to defendants...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
