SAVRAN v. CHIANG


234 A.D.2d 54 (1996)

650 N.Y.S.2d 203

Martin Savran et al., Respondents, v. Chi Jung Chiang et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

December 5, 1996


We agree with the IAS Court that defendants cannot attack an agreement that they adhered to and derived benefits from without objection for four years after learning of the alleged fraud (Jaywyn Video Prods. v Servicing All Media, 179 A.D.2d 397, 398). We would add that defendants' claim they were defrauded into buying a residential building that they believed to be commercial would in any event be barred by plaintiffs' specific...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases