CINCINNATI BAR ASSN. v. BORTZ

No. 95-1669.

74 Ohio St.3d 207 (1996)

CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. BORTZ.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided January 10, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard J. Ruebel, Hollis A. Moore III and Edwin W. Patterson III, for relator.

Helmer, Lugbill, Martins & Neff Co., L.P.A., and James B. Helmer, Jr., for respondent.


Per Curiam.

Upon review of the record, we concur in the board's finding of misconduct and its recommendation. Respondent is therefore publicly reprimanded for his violation of DR 5-101(A). Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur.

WRIGHT, J., dissents.

WRIGHT, J., dissenting. Regrettably, I must respectfully dissent. I recognize the mitigating...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases