OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. SOPKOVICH

No. 95-1199.

75 Ohio St.3d 192 (1996)

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. SOPKOVICH.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided March 5, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Geoffrey Stern, Disciplinary Counsel, and Alvin E. Mathews, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.

Richards & Meola and Charles L. Richards, for respondent.


Per Curiam.

We find that the findings of the board are well supported by the record and that the sanctions imposed are appropriate.

Respondent has admitted that she violated DR 9-102(A), which states: "All funds of clients paid to a lawyer or law firm, other than advances for costs and expenses, shall be deposited in one or more identifiable bank accounts maintained in the state in which the law office is situated * * *." However, respondent contends...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases