1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 40 Conn.
  5. 40 Conn. App. 227 (1996)
 

KATHURIA v. PURCELL

(13993)

40 Conn. App. 227 (1996)

MINESHWAR KATHURIA ET AL. v. RICHARD K. PURCELL

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decision released February 6, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald J. Deneen, with whom was Janis C. Jerman, for the appellants (plaintiffs).

William C. Franklin, with whom, on the brief, was Eric A. Russman, for the appellee (defendant).

Schaller, Spear and Hennessy, Js.

SCHALLER, J.

The plaintiffs, Mineshwar Kathuria and Nirmal B. Kathuria, appeal from the judgment of the trial court dismissing their summary process action against the defendant. The plaintiffs claim that the trial court improperly (1) concluded that the formula in the lease extension option exercised by the defendant providing for the amount of rent due during the lease extension was ambiguous, (2) failed to consider...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases