1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 205 Wis.2d
  5. 205 Wis.2d 60 (1996)
 

WISCONSIN PROFESSIONAL POLICE ASS'N v. PSC

No. 95-2438.

205 Wis.2d 60 (1996)

555 N.W.2d 179

WISCONSIN PROFESSIONAL POLICE ASSOCIATION; Wisconsin Law Enforcement Officers' Association; Terry Perry, Coordinator, City of Milwaukee Common Council Task Force on Sexual Assault and Domestic Violence; Robert Overs; Leslie Bird, Executive Director, Dane County Advocates for Battered Women; Michael Hanrahan; Becky Westerfelt, Executive Director, Rape Crisis Center, Dane County; Kathleen Krenek, Policy Development Coordinator, Wisconsin Coalition Against Domestic Violence; David Rossow; Ruth Robarts, Executive Director, 1199W/United Professionals For Quality Health Care/SEIU; Carole Smolizer; Wisconsin Association of Personnel Services; Frank Evans; Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility; Teresa Meuer, Coordinator, Wisconsin Crime Victim's Council; Citizens Utility Board; Anne Baldwin; Nancy Bosin; Maria Gale Beyer; Gordon Lipsky; Ken McFadden; Sally Schmid; Raechel Foertser; and Don Schwamb, Petitioners-Respondents, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WISCONSIN, Respondent-Co-Appellant, WISCONSIN BELL, INC., Intervenor-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided September 30, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the respondent-co-appellant the cause was submitted on the briefs of Steven M. Schur and Steven Levine of the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin and orally argued by Steven Levine.

For the intervenor-appellant the cause was submitted on the briefs of Michael A. Green and Michael Paulson of Milwaukee and orally argued by Michael Paulson.

For the petitioners-respondents the cause was submitted on the brief of Lynn Adelman and Jon Deitrich of Adelman, Adelman & Murray, S.C. of Milwaukee and orally argued by Lynn Adelman.

Before Dykman, P.J., Vergeront, J., and Robert D. Sundby, Reserve Judge.

DYKMAN, P.J.

The Public Service Commission of Wisconsin and Wisconsin Bell, Inc. appeal from a circuit court order reversing the decision of the commission to allow per-line blocking of Caller ID1 only on a limited basis and remanding the matter to the commission. The issues on appeal are: (1) whether the commission's decision is supported by substantial evidence or is arbitrary or capricious; and (2) whether the commission's decision...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases