Substantial evidence supported the agency's determination, after an administrative hearing, that there was no medical necessity or sufficient documentation to justify petitioner's ordering sample claim number 148, a test for lead toxicity, and that petitioner was thus in violation of 18 NYCRR 515.2 (b) (see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ.,
However, as to sample claim number 106 for a retroperitoneal...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.