PARAMO v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA

No. 1 CA-IC 95-0008.

186 Ariz. 75 (1996)

918 P.2d 1093

Rogalio PARAMO, Petitioner, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA, Respondent, Salyer American Fresh, Respondent Employer, State Compensation Fund, Respondent Carrier.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department D.

June 4, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barton L. Baker, Yuma, for Petitioner.

Anita R. Valainis, Chief Counsel, Industrial Commission of Arizona, Phoenix, for Respondent.

State Compensation Fund by W. Smith Michael, Jr., Tucson, for Respondents Employer and Carrier.


OPINION

PATTERSON, Presiding Judge.

In this special action review of an Industrial Commission decision, the petitioner-employee ("claimant") argues that the award by the Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") was not supported by reasonable evidence. Specifically, he argues that the job of lettuce taper was not suitable and was not reasonably available to him. For the following reasons, we find that the job was suitable and reasonably available and affirm the award...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases