The subject language, even if drafted inartfully, does not create an ambiguity, since the parties' intent is discernable (see, Calce v Futterman,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
206 EAST 95TH ST. ASSOCS. v. INS. CO. OF STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
234 A.D.2d 21 (1996)
650 N.Y.S.2d 163
206 East 95th Street Associates, Also Known as 206 East 95th Street Realty Corp., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Insurance Company of State of Pennsylvania et al., Defendants, Tishman Construction Corporation of New York, Appellant-Respondent, and M&a Plumbing, Respondent-Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
December 3, 1996
December 3, 1996
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.