MINATRONICS v. BUCHANAN INGERSOLL (NO. 2)

Nos. GD90-20422 and GD92-7496.

28 Pa. D. & C. 4th 214 (1996)

Minatronics Corporation v. Buchanan Ingersoll P.C. (No. 2)

Common Pleas Court of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania.

February 7, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven A. Haber, Gregory D. Saputelli and Albert C. Odermatt, Jr., for plaintiff.

David B. Fawcett and Leland P. Schermer, for defendant Buchanan Ingersoll.

George Raynovich, defendant, pro se.

John R. McGinley, for defendant Adams.


WETTICK, J., February 7, 1996.

The subject of this opinion and order of court is the joint motion of Buchanan Ingersoll P.C. and John M. Adams to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction all claims based on the loss of patent rights.

In March 1986, plaintiff, Minatronics, retained defendant law firm to obtain appropriate patents for a fiber optic security system. The law firm assigned the matter to defendant John M. Adams, a patent attorney employed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases