MEDINA v. CLINTON

No. 95-15571.

86 F.3d 155 (1996)

Eduardo MEDINA; Harvey Reynolds; and George Singleton, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. William J. CLINTON, President of the United States of America; Department of Labor; Robert Reich, Secretary of the Department of Labor, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided June 12, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul Gattone, Southern Arizona People's Law Center; Nancy O'Neill, National Lawyers Guild, Southern Arizona Chapter, Tucson, Arizona, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Sushma Soni, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for defendants-appellees.

Before: T.G. NELSON and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges, and BURNS, District Judge.


TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs are three unemployed or under-employed adult males. They commenced this putative class action on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated against defendants the President of the United States of America, William J. Clinton (the "President"), the Department of Labor and the Secretary of Labor Robert Reich to compel the creation or expansion of federal job programs. The district court dismissed their action for lack of subject...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases