PAGE v. SOMETHING WEIRD VIDEO

No. CV 94-2327 RAP (BQRx).

960 F.Supp. 1438 (1996)

Bettie PAGE, Plaintiff, v. SOMETHING WEIRD VIDEO, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, C.D. California.

December 3, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stanley Fleishman, Robert Moest, David Grosz, Fleishman, Fisher & Moest, Los Angeles, CA, James Bouras, Law Office of James Bouras, New York City, for Defendants.

Martin Singer, Max Sprecher, Lavely & Singer, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff.


AMENDED ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES

PAEZ, District Judge.

I.

INTRODUCTION

This diversity action arises out of the alleged misappropriation of plaintiff Bettie Page's ("plaintiff" or "Page") "likeness" in the recent advertising of home video cassettes for two films in which she starred in the 1950s.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases