1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 219 A.D.2d
  5. 219 A.D.2d 19 (1996)
 

NYC v. 924 COLUMBUS ASSOCS.

219 A.D.2d 19 (1996)

640 N.Y.S.2d 497

City of New York, Appellant, v. 924 Columbus Associates, L. P., et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

March 19, 1996

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald E. Sternberg of counsel (Leonard Koerner on the brief; Paul A. Crotty, Corporation Counsel of New York City, attorney), for appellant.

Michael N. Coritsidis of counsel (Coritsidis & Lambros, attorneys), for William Marolda and another, respondents.

ROSENBERGER, J. P., ELLERIN, KUPFERMAN and MAZZARELLI, JJ., concur.

NARDELLI, J.

The City Council has determined that the use of property in flagrant violation of the laws relating to controlled substances and dangerous drugs interferes with the "quality of life" and the community environment, besides endangering property values and the public health, safety and welfare of the public, and therefore, enacted the "Nuisance Abatement Law" (Administrative Code of City of NY §...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases