1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 928 F.Supp.
  5. 928 F.Supp. 1451 (1996)
 

HUNTSMAN FARMS, INC. v. ESPY

No. LR-C-94-507.

928 F.Supp. 1451 (1996)

HUNTSMAN FARMS, INC., Keith Huntsman, Howard Huntsman, Wesley Huntsman, and Tommy Wachtel, Plaintiffs, v. Mike ESPY, Secretary, United States Department of Agriculture, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division.

January 4, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel A. Perroni, Little Rock, AR, for plaintiffs.

Richard M. Pence, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, Little Rock, AR, for defendant.

ORDER

ROY, District Judge.

The instant case is an action for judicial review under the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. § 701, et seq., and seeks a determination that certain decisions by the Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service ("ASCS") of the United States Department of Agriculture pertaining to eligibility for and payment under the Payment Limitation Regulations, 7 C.F.R. Part 795, were arbitrary and capricious...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases