1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 206 Wis.2d
  5. 206 Wis.2d 30 (1996)
 

STATE v. McMASTER

No. 95-1159-CR.

206 Wis.2d 30 (1996)

556 N.W.2d 673

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Peter J. McMASTER, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided December 13, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the defendant-appellant-petitioner there were briefs by Daniel P. Fay, Joseph M. Amidon and Law Firm of Daniel P. Fay, S.C., Pewaukee and oral argument by Joseph M. Amidon and Daniel P. Fay.

For the plaintiff-respondent the cause was argued by Maureen McGlynn Flanagan, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was James E. Doyle, attorney general.

DONALD W. STEINMETZ, J.

The issue in this case is whether the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits the criminal prosecution of the defendant for violations of Wis. Stat. §§ 346.631 and 346.65,2 subsequent to the administrative suspension of his driving privileges under Wis. Stat. § 343.305(7) and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases