1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 48 Cal.App.4th
  5. 48 Cal.App.4th 182 (1996)
 

STANISLAUS NATURAL HERITAGE v. CTY. OF STANISLAUS

Docket No. F023638.

48 Cal.App.4th 182 (1996)

STANISLAUS NATURAL HERITAGE PROJECT et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, Defendant and Respondent; DIABLO GRANDE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

August 8, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Brandt-Hawley & Zoia, Susan Brandt-Hawley and Rose M. Zoia for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger, Mark I. Weinberger and Tamara S. Galanter as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Michael H. Krausnick, County Counsel, and E. Vernon Seeley, Assistant County Counsel, for Defendant and Respondent.

Meyers, Nave, Riback, Silver & Wilson, Steven R. Meyers, Andrea J. Saltzman, Rick W. Jarvis, Normoyle & Newman, Russell A. Newman and George A. Petrulakis for Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

OPINION

ARDAIZ, P.J.

The "tiering" provisions (Pub. Resources Code, §§ 21068.5, 21093, 21094 — see fn. 5, post) of the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq., or CEQA) enable a public agency to avoid, under some circumstances, having to undertake a repetitious analysis of significant environmental...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases