1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 101 F.3d
  5. 101 F.3d 129 (1996)
 

AMBROSINI v. LABARRAQUE

No. 95-7270.

101 F.3d 129 (1996)

Teresa AMBROSINI, et al., Appellants, v. Jorge LABARRAQUE and The Upjohn Company, Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided December 6, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barry J. Nace, Washington, DC, argued the cause for appellants, with whom Kenneth J. Chesebro, Cambridge, MA, was on the briefs.

George E. Berry, pro hac vice, argued the cause, for appellees. David M. Covey, Allen M. Hecht, New York City, and Roger W. Heald, Washington, DC, were on the brief. Michael F. Flynn, Jr. and Katherine S. Duyer, Rockville, MD, entered appearances.

Before: EDWARDS, Chief Judge, HENDERSON and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS.

Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge HENDERSON.

ROGERS, Circuit Judge:

This case appears before this court for the second time after the district court granted summary judgment to appellees, Dr. Jorge Labarraque and the Upjohn Company. Again, we address only the question of the admissibility, not the weight, of the Ambrosinis' expert evidence. The district court initially ruled that the Ambrosinis...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases