1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 915 P.2d
  5. 915 P.2d 1382 (1996)
 

TYLER v. KEENEY

No. 21601.

915 P.2d 1382 (1996)

128 Idaho 524

Sheryl TYLER, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Robert R. King, an individual, Plaintiff, v. Frank KEENEY and Jane Doe Keeney, husband and wife, d/b/a Frank Keeney Logging, Defendants-Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Idaho.

April 25, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brown & Litteneker, Lewiston, for appellant. Charles A. Brown, argued.

Danny J. Radakovich, Lewiston, for respondents.

PERRY, Judge.

We are asked in this appeal to review the district court's order denying Sheryl Tyler relief on his I.R.C.P. 60(b) motion. We agree with the district court's conclusion that Tyler was not entitled to Rule 60(b) relief because Tyler acted unreasonably in failing to communicate with this counsel to monitor the case. We, therefore, affirm the district court's order denying relief under I.R.C.P. 60(b)(1) and (3). We hold as harmless the district court's...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases