FARO v. HIGHWAY DIVISION

92-01-34624; CA A86430.

923 P.2d 1298 (1996)

143 Or. App. 388

Tony D. FARO, Respondent, v. HIGHWAY DIVISION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, STATE OF OREGON, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 11, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jas. Adams, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause, for appellant. With him on the briefs, were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

George W. Kelly, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the brief, for respondent.

Before DEITS, P.J., and De MUNIZ and HASELTON, JJ.


DEITS, Presiding Judge.

In 1990, plaintiff was discharged by his employer, the defendant State Highway Division. Defendant's explanation for the discharge was that plaintiff had stolen property from it. Plaintiff brought this action for wrongful discharge and for unlawful employment practices, ORS 659.121, in connection with the discharge. Plaintiff alleged that the discharge was actually motivated by discrimination against him because of his visual impairment and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases