1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 923 P.2d
  5. 923 P.2d 1280 (1996)
 

GROSHONG v. MUTUAL OF ENUMCLAW INS. CO.

9407-04901; CA A89325.

923 P.2d 1280 (1996)

143 Or. App. 450

Joel C. GROSHONG, Joann Huth and Gary Huth, Appellants, v. MUTUAL OF ENUMCLAW INSURANCE COMPANY, a Washington corporation, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 11, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward L. Sears, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs was Lehner, Mitchell, Rodrigues & Sears.

Thomas M. Christ, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Mitchell, Lang & Smith.

Before DEITS, P.J., and De MUNIZ and HASELTON, JJ.

HASELTON, Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal from the trial court's judgment, following a stipulated facts trial, that the defendant insurance company was not obligated to defend and indemnify plaintiffs against a claim of intentional housing discrimination. We affirm.

The parties stipulated to the following facts: Plaintiff Joel Groshong owned the Cabana Apartments in Portland and employed plaintiffs JoAnn and Gary Huth to manage them. In November 1992, a prospective...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases