BARBER v. SCHENK

94-0601-C; CA A86910.

923 P.2d 1278 (1996)

143 Or. App. 472

Howard F. BARBER and Eleanor W. Barber, Respondents, v. Laura SCHENK, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Motion for Sanctions April 17, 1996.

Decided September 11, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert E. Bluth, Medford, filed the statement for respondents.

Laura E. Schenk filed the motion pro se for appellant.

Before LANDAU, P.J., and HASELTON and ARMSTRONG, JJ.


On Respondents' Petition for Attorney Fees April 12, 1996.

Appellant's Motion for Sanctions April 17, 1996.

HASELTON, Judge.

Plaintiffs petition for attorney fees, and defendant cross moves for sanctions, following our affirmance of a judgment for plaintiffs in a forcible entry and detainer (FED) action. Barber v. Schenk, 139 Or.App. 600, 913 P.2d 347 (1996). Plaintiffs contend that, under ORS 90.255, they are entitled to fees reasonably incurred...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases