1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 921 F.Supp.
  5. 921 F.Supp. 1277 (1996)
 

RUSSEK v. UNISYS CORP.

Civ. A. No. 93-5738 (JEI).

921 F.Supp. 1277 (1996)

Philip J. RUSSEK and Deborah Russek, h/w, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNISYS CORPORATION et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

April 10, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Greitzer and Locks by James J. Pettit, Cherry Hill, NJ, for Plaintiffs.

McKenna & Cuneo by Raymond Biagini (Argued), Mark Rowland, Washington, DC, and Porzio, Bromberg & Newman, P.C. by Steven P. Benenson, Morristown, NJ, for Defendant Unisys Corporation.

OPINION

IRENAS, District Judge:

Plaintiffs in these consolidated actions1 are all past or present employees of the United States Postal Service ("the Postal Service").2 They bring state law design defect and failure to warn claims alleging that Multiple Position Letter Sorting Machines ("MPLSM") used by the Postal Service and manufactured by Burroughs Corporation ("Burroughs"), to which defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases