1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 942 F.Supp.
  5. 942 F.Supp. 1252 (1996)
 

ARMSTRONG v. WILSON

No. C 94-2307 CW.

942 F.Supp. 1252 (1996)

John ARMSTRONG, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Pete WILSON, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

September 20, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Warren E. George, McCutchen Doyle Brown & Enersen LLP, San Francisco, CA, Elaine Feingold, Disability Rights Education & Defense Fund, Inc., Berkeley, CA, Michael W. Bien, Rosen Bien & Asaro, San Francisco, CA, Donald Specter, Prison Law Office, San Quentin, CA, for plaintiffs.

Roy Zattiero, pro se.

Morris Lenk, CA State Atty. General's Office, George D. Prince, Deputy Atty. General, CA State Atty. General's Office, San Francisco, CA, for defendants.

Mary Beth Uitti, U.S. Attorney's Office, San Francisco, CA, Sharon N. Perley, U.S.D.J. — Disability Rights Section, Civil Rights Division, Washington, DC, for United States of America, Amicus Curiae.

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

WILKEN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, a certified class consisting of all present and future California state prison inmates and parolees with mobility1, sight, hearing, learning or kidney disabilities, have moved for injunctive relief under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12131 — 34, and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases