1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 909 P.2d
  5. 909 P.2d 1242 (1996)
 

IN THE MATTER OF WOFFORD

WCB 94-04772; CA A87858.

909 P.2d 1242 (1996)

138 Or. App. 560

In the Matter of the Compensation of Michael L. Wofford, Claimant. ROSEBURG FOREST PRODUCTS, Petitioner, v. Michael L. WOFFORD, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided January 24, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Adam T. Stamper, Medford, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Cowling, Heysell, Plouse, Ingalls & Moore.

G. Duff Bloom, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Coons, Cole, Cary & Wing, P.C.

Before RIGGS, P.J., and LANDAU and LEESON, JJ.

RIGGS, Presiding Judge.

Employer seeks review of an order of the Worker's Compensation Board affirming an administrative law judge's order relying on Williams v. Gates, McDonald & Co., 300 Or. 278, 709 P.2d 712 (1985), to uphold the compensability of medical treatment for a non-work related preexisting condition as a prelude to treatment of a compensable condition. In 1995, the legislature...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases