STANFORD v. KULONGOSKI

SC S43527.

922 P.2d 1227 (1996)

324 Or. 226

Douglas Paul STANFORD, Petitioner, v. Theodore R. KULONGOSKI, Attorney General, State of Oregon, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided September 26, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas Paul Stanford, petitioner pro se, filed the petition.

John T. Bagg, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the answering memorandum for respondent. With him on the answering memorandum were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.


PER CURIAM.

This is an original proceeding to review a ballot title certified to the Secretary of State by the Attorney General. Petitioner is an elector who is entitled, under ORS 250.085(2), to seek a revised ballot title. His only claim, which the Attorney General agrees is well taken, is that the caption of the Attorney General's ballot title incorrectly states that the proposed initiative measure amends the state constitution. In fact, the measure is a proposed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases