ROBINSON v. GROH

16-94-00814; CA A86555.

909 P.2d 1240 (1996)

138 Or. App. 506

Ralph W. ROBINSON; Harry Rubenstein; and Neal K. Sande, Appellants, v. Ina Louise GROH, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided January 17, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James N. Westwood, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs were Charles O. Porter, Eugene and Miller, Nash, Wiener, Hager & Carlsen, Portland.

Charles D. Carlson, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Brown, Roseta, Long & McConville.

Before WARREN, P.J., and EDMONDS and ARMSTRONG, JJ.


EDMONDS, Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment entered pursuant to an order granting summary judgment. ORCP 47. The judgment dismisses their claim against defendant for an alleged wrongful use of a civil proceeding. We affirm.

In early 1994, plaintiffs filed their claim. Defendant answered, denying the material allegations of the claim and alleging certain affirmative defenses, including that the applicable statute of limitations had run on plaintiffs'...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases