1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 100 F.3d
  5. 100 F.3d 111 (1996)
 

U.S. v. RUTH

No. 96-3140.

100 F.3d 111 (1996)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas B. RUTH, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

November 5, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas B. Ruth, pro se.

Robin D. Fowler, Assistant U.S. Attorney (Jackie N. Williams, U.S. Attorney, with him on the brief), Kansas City, KS, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before TACHA, BALDOCK, and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges.

TACHA, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

On November 30, 1989, Thomas Ruth pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases