1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 913 P.2d
  5. 913 P.2d 1193 (1996)
 

PITZER v. SWENSON

No. 21878.

913 P.2d 1193 (1996)

128 Idaho 423

William M. PITZER, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Donald R. & Carol SWENSON, husband and wife, Defendants-Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Idaho.

March 28, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James W. Atwood, Coeur d'Alene, for appellants.

Richard G. Whitehead, Coeur d'Alene, for respondent.

PERRY, Judge.

In this case, we are asked to review the district court's findings of fact and conclusions of law following a court trial. Because only two of the district court's three alternative legal theories for relief were challenged on appeal, we affirm the district court's award of damages on the unappealed theory.

I.

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The parties in this case were involved in a contract regarding the sale and purchase of a

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases