1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 931 F.Supp.
  5. 931 F.Supp. 1115 (1996)
 

FREEMAN v. COMPLEX COMPUTING CO., INC.

No. 95 Civ. 3811 (LAK).

931 F.Supp. 1115 (1996)

Daniel FREEMAN, Plaintiff, v. COMPLEX COMPUTING COMPANY, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

June 28, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barbara E. Olk, Ted Trief, Trief & Olk, New York City, for Plaintiff.

Richard B. Cohen, Akabas & Cohen, New York City, for Defendants Complex Computing Co., Inc. and Jason Glazier.

James F. Rittinger, Satterlee Stephens Burke & Burke LLP, New York City, for Defendant Thomson Trading Services, Inc.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KAPLAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff Daniel Freeman claims that defendant Complex Computing Company ("C3") breached the contract between them and that C3 was tortiously induced to do so by defendants Jason Glazier and Thomson Trading Services, Inc. ("Thomson"). Now before the Court are defendants' motion to stay this action pending arbitration and plaintiff's cross-motion to compel all defendants to arbitrate and to disqualify defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases