MITCHEM v. RICE

C94-0378CV; CA A87838.

920 P.2d 1121 (1996)

142 Or. App. 214

Carla MITCHEM, Appellant, v. David RICE, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 17, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lilian Bier, Beaverton, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were Brien F. Hildebrand and Moomaw, Miller & Hildebrand.

James F. Hutchinson, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Cavanagh & Zipse.

Before RIGGS, P.J., and LANDAU and LEESON, JJ.


LANDAU, Judge.

The trial court entered summary judgment in favor of defendant on the ground that defendant had not been timely served. Plaintiff appeals, arguing that the undisputed facts show that she did, in fact, timely serve defendant in accordance with all applicable rules. We conclude that the trial court was correct and affirm.

The relevant facts are undisputed. On May 7, 1992, plaintiff was injured in an automobile accident involving defendant. On...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases