IN THE MATTER OF DOOLITTLE

94-03703; CA A88667.

914 P.2d 1112 (1996)

140 Or. App. 373

In the Matter of the Compensation of Leota J. Doolittle, Claimant. SAIF CORPORATION, Petitioner, and Feather Merchant Pet Shop, Employer, v. Leota J. DOOLITTLE, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 17, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael O. Whitty, Special Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Robert L. Ackerman, Springfield, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Ackerman, DeWenter & Huntsberger, P.C.

Before RIGGS, P.J., and LANDAU and LEESON, JJ.


LEESON, Judge.

SAIF seeks review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board, contending that the Board erred in calculating claimant's unscheduled permanent partial disability, because it did not use the Dictionary of Occupational Titles (DOT) code that most accurately describes claimant's job at the time of injury. We remand for reconsideration.

Claimant worked in a pet store. She compensably injured her upper back while moving boxes of aquarium rock...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases