U.S. v. ADU

No. 95-1488.

82 F.3d 119 (1996)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shakiru ADU, a/k/a Alhaji Shakiru, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided April 15, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Debold (argued and briefed), J. Michael Buckley, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Detroit, MI, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Shakiru Adu, Milan, MI, pro se, Paul D. Muller (argued and briefed), Farmington, MI, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: LIVELY, MARTIN, and MOORE, Circuit Judges.


LIVELY, Circuit Judge.

Early in this decade, Congress became concerned that the inflexibility of statutory mandatory minimum sentences was resulting in unjust punishments in some cases. Congress was particularly concerned with the inability of federal trial courts to consider mitigating factors to impose proportionally lower sentences on the least culpable participants in multi-defendant drug trafficking cases. See H.R.Rep...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases