1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 671 A.2d
  5. 671 A.2d 1344 (1996)
 

DISABATINO v. SALICETE

Nos. 462, 1994, 23, 1995.

671 A.2d 1344 (1996)

Michael DISABATINO, Respondent Below, Appellant, v. Mary Anne SALICETE, Petitioner Below, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Decided: January 16, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas S. Neuberger (argued), Wilmington, and Gary L. Smith, Newark, for appellant.

Daniel F. Kelleher, Trzuskowski, Kipp, Kelleher & Pearce, P.A., Wilmington, for appellee.

Michael J. Rich, State Solicitor, Peter S. Feliceangeli and W. Michael Tupman, Deputy Attorney General, Wilmington, amicus curiae, for Delaware Dept. of Justice.

Chandlee Johnson Kuhn, Prickett, Jones, Elliott, Kristol & Schnee, Wilmington, amicus curiae, for Delaware Family Law Section of the Delaware State Bar Ass'n.

Before VEASEY, C.J., WALSH, HOLLAND, HARTNETT and BERGER, JJ. (constituting the Court en Banc).

HOLLAND, Justice:

The parties were divorced on July 1, 1993. Thereafter, the appellee, Mary Anne Salicete ("Salicete") filed a series of petitions for a Rule to Show Cause. Each petition alleged that the appellant, Michael DiSabatino ("DiSabatino"), had violated prior orders of the Family Court.

The Family Court conducted hearings, made findings of fact, and entered dispositions on several of the petitions. The first...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases