1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 671 A.2d
  5. 671 A.2d 1335 (1996)
 

STROIK v. STATE

Nos. 137, 138, 1994.

671 A.2d 1335 (1996)

Richard STROIK and Ronald Biddle, Defendants Below, Appellants, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff Below, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Decided: January 12, 1996.

Rehearing Denied February 26, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raymond M. Radulski (argued), Timothy J. Weiler (argued), and Bernard J. O'Donnell, Assistant Public Defenders, Wilmington, for Appellants.

William E. Molchen (argued), and Thomas A. Stevens, Deputy Attorneys General, Wilmington, for Appellee.

Before VEASEY, C.J., WALSH and HOLLAND, JJ.

VEASEY, Chief Justice:

In this appeal we review several assignments of error asserted to reverse sentences imposed on convictions for various offenses. Defendants below-appellants, Ronald Biddle and Richard Stroik ("Stroik and Biddle" or "defendants"), appeal sentences of the Superior Court based on convictions for racketeering, conspiracy to commit racketeering, felony theft and misdemeanor theft on various grounds enumerated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases