1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 917 P.2d
  5. 917 P.2d 1051 (1996)
 

HUNTZICKER v. WASHINGTON COUNTY

LUBA Nos. 94-160, 94-181; CA A92180.

917 P.2d 1051 (1996)

141 Or. App. 257

James J. HUNTZICKER, Patricia M. Huntzicker and Bethany Neighbors, Petitioners, v. WASHINGTON COUNTY and Central Bethany Development Company, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided May 29, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey L. Kleinman, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioners.

David C. Noren, Assistant County Counsel, argued the cause for respondent Washington County. With him on the brief was Dan R. Olsen, Interim Washington County Counsel.

Jeff H. Bachrach, Portland, argued the cause for respondent Central Bethany Development Company. With him on the brief was O'Donnell Ramis Crew Corrigan & Bachrach.

Before DEITS, P.J., and De MUNIZ and HASELTON, JJ.

DEITS, Presiding Judge.

Petitioners seek review of LUBA's affirmance of the Washington County governing body's approval of respondent Central Bethany Development Company's (respondent) application for a planned development. We affirm.

We take the facts, in part, from LUBA's opinion:

"On or about December 31, 1992, [respondent] filed an application for approval of the `Bethany Planned Development Master Plan' (master plan) on 92 acres. The subject...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases