GUTOSKI v. LANE COUNTY

95-192; CA A92492.

917 P.2d 1048 (1996)

141 Or. App. 265

Peter and Judy GUTOSKI, Petitioners, v. LANE COUNTY and Vernon L. Egge, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided May 29, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bill Kloos, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was Johnson, Kloos & Sherton.

Laurence E. Thorp, Springfield, argued the cause for respondent Vernon L. Egge. With him on the brief was Thorp, Purdy, Jewett, Urness & Wilkinson, P.C.

No appearance for respondent Lane County.

Before DEITS, P.J., and De MUNIZ and HASELTON, JJ.


DEITS, Presiding Judge.

Petitioners seek review of LUBA's affirmance of Lane County's decision to reduce the required minimum lot size in a residential zone and, thereby, to enable respondent Egge to add a second residence on his property. We reverse.

Respondent's property is adjacent to petitioners'. Petitioners' property is zoned and used for agriculture. Respondent's property was at one time similarly zoned, but was rezoned to its original residential designation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases