EMPLOYMENT DEPT. v. FURSETH

95-AB-1185, 95-AB-1326; CA A89421.

915 P.2d 1043 (1996)

140 Or. App. 464

EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT, Petitioner, v. Peter M. FURSETH, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided May 1, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard D. Wasserman, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

No appearance for respondent Peter M. Furseth.

Before RIGGS, P.J., and LANDAU and LEESON, JJ.


RIGGS, Presiding Judge.

The Employment Department seeks review of an order of the Employment Appeals Board (EAB), contending that EAB erred in holding that the department is estopped to deny claimant's request for additional Trade Readjustment Allowances (TRA). We affirm.

Oregon participates in the Federal Trade Adjustment Assistance Program through an agreement with the Secretary of Labor, 19 U.S.C. § 2311, and administers TRAs, a federal benefit paid...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases