1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 694 So.2d
  5. 694 So.2d 1256 (1996)
 

LAMAR ADVERTISING v. STATE DOT.

1941386, 1941387 and 1941396.

694 So.2d 1256 (1996)

LAMAR ADVERTISING OF MONTGOMERY, INC., and Dyess Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. STATE of Alabama DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. HEADRICK OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, INC. v. STATE of Alabama DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Rehearing Denied April 18, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W. Joseph McCorkle, Jr., and Dorman Walker of Balch & Bingham, Montgomery, for appellants Lamar Advertising of Montgomery, Inc., and Dyess Outdoor Advertising, Inc.

Susan Russ Walker of Miller, Hamilton, Snider & Odom, Montgomery, for appellant Headrick Outdoor Advertising, Inc.

Jerry L. Weidler, counsel, Alabama Department of Transportation, Montgomery, for appellee.

RICHARD L. JONES, Retired Justice.

These three cases have been previously reviewed by this Court on separate appeals.1 The trial court proceedings resulted in summary judgments favorable to the three sign companies. The trial court held that the Alabama Highway Department (now known as the Alabama Department of Transportation ("ALDOT")) was equitably estopped from claiming that signs erected between March 1983 and November 1988 in reliance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases