SAN BENITO FOODS v. VENEMAN

Docket No. H014311.

50 Cal.App.4th 1889 (1996)

SAN BENITO FOODS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ANN M. VENEMAN, as Director, etc., Defendant and Respondent; MORENO FARMS, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District.

November 22, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Sagaser, Hansen, Franson & Jamison and Donald R. Franson, Jr., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, Roderick Walston, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Jan S. Stevens, Assistant Attorney General, Richard M. Frank and Christine Sproul, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Respondent.

No appearance for Real Party in Interest.


OPINION

MIHARA, J.

The only questions presented in this appeal are what the correct standard of proof is in an administrative proceeding involving a threatened suspension or revocation of a food processing license and what the correct standard of review is in the superior court when a writ of administrative mandamus is sought to overturn the administrative agency's decision to impose a stayed suspension of such a license on condition...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases